Hardly worth a blog, this. But it's longer than Twitter will let me tweet.
A granny has been jailed for FIVE FRIGGIN' YEARS because she had a gun. She kept it under the mattress. She should have handed it in.
So far as I can see, the extenuating circumstances here are that she could have sought permission from Scottish ministers to keep it, though it would be unlikely that they would have given such permission. And it was a memento of her father - about all that she had left to remind her of him.
It was a 1927 Browning 7.65 which, had she tried to use it, may well have blown her hand off. And she had no ammo for it.
Here is the horseshit part ...
Under laws introduced in the wake of the Dunblane shooting massacre, the offence carries a minimum five-year jail sentence unless a judge is satisfied there are "exceptional circumstances".
My mate lives in Dunblane, it's a nice town. It has a very sad memorial to the victims of the Dunblane massacre, you should see it if you haven't already. It's in the churchyard.
The nutjob responsible for the Dunblane massacre had a gun licence. So did the nutjob that did Carlisle.
That is all.
3 comments:
So did the Hungerford nutjob
You're right. It is a load of bulshit.
I've had a crack at it here
I read the blogs and they were all interesting, some made me laugh, some made me think - to my wee mind, that's the combo I like.
On the gun thing, how daft was that? Why does the fact that it was a non-working memento not be valid as an exceptional circumstance. Sometimes I do think this world is quite mad. I don't claim to be the only sane person in it but I do wonder where the sane people are???
Post a Comment